<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is AOL Only Worth $12.25 Billion?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://learn2adapt.com/blog/2008/04/10/is-aol-only-worth-1225-billion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://learn2adapt.com/blog/2008/04/10/is-aol-only-worth-1225-billion/</link>
	<description>Occasional prattle on life and learning in the 21st century</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 02:10:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Francis Wong</title>
		<link>http://learn2adapt.com/blog/2008/04/10/is-aol-only-worth-1225-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Wong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learn2adapt.com/blog/2008/04/10/is-aol-only-worth-1225-billion/#comment-70</guid>
		<description>I think #1 explains the inflated price &quot;Google paid too much for its 5% stake in 2005&quot;.  But they paid too much on purpose.  At that time, Google&#039;s search dominance wasn&#039;t complete yet.  Microsoft was making aggressive pushes with their search.  And Yahoo was still considered a serious threat to Google.  So part of the 5% price bought a strategic alliance so AOL would use Google search technology, cross-share their ads/content and cooperate on areas such as video search.   And that 5% also helped to keep AOL from being completely crushed.  Since the investment, Google has made no aggressive moves directly against AOL that I can think of.  It&#039;s the technological equivalent of a peace treaty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think #1 explains the inflated price &#8220;Google paid too much for its 5% stake in 2005&#8243;.  But they paid too much on purpose.  At that time, Google&#8217;s search dominance wasn&#8217;t complete yet.  Microsoft was making aggressive pushes with their search.  And Yahoo was still considered a serious threat to Google.  So part of the 5% price bought a strategic alliance so AOL would use Google search technology, cross-share their ads/content and cooperate on areas such as video search.   And that 5% also helped to keep AOL from being completely crushed.  Since the investment, Google has made no aggressive moves directly against AOL that I can think of.  It&#8217;s the technological equivalent of a peace treaty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
